

| Subject: | Re: Coolant resistance thru coolant level probe |
| From: | patrick paul clerkin |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2001 03:22:00 -0500 |
Or perhaps they were using bottled water because they love their VW's so much. /Patrick On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Leon Korkin wrote: > Larry, > That's scientific approach! Valuable results too. > My question is, if trigger point is at 42K than using ordnary tap water will > not cause that blinking light to blink, would it? Why then some people had > it blinking with tanks full of coolant? > Perhaps the sensor is capacitive? Being more sensitive than resistance? Just > guessing. > Leon > 85 Subwagen Westy > > Larry Alofs wrote: > > > Volks, > > I finally tracked down a coolant leak that had been bothering me for a > > month. Had a small crack in the pressure tank between the pressure cap > > and the coolant level sensor. Since I had to disassemble things anyway, > > I decided to take the coolant level sensor and attempt the definitive > > study of the resistance of various coolant mixtures and then see how > > these values compare to the resistance needed to trigger that &%#* > > blinking light. > > The coolant level sensor was placed in each liquid sample about 1/2 in > > deep in a clean plastic cup. Initially as removed from the van the > > probes looked mostly clean and shiny with a few particles of dirt > > covering less than 20% of the surface. After the first measurement, the > > probes were rinsed between measurements. > > Note that the resistance of liquids generally cannot be measured > > accurately with a typical ohmmeter using a DC test current because > > chemical reactions occur which quickly coat the electrodes and change > > the readings drastically. These measurements were made by using 14 V AC > > applied to a series circuit consisting of the coolant probe and an > > adjustable resistance as a voltage divider. When the voltage at the > > junction was half of the total voltage, I assumed that the adjustable > > resistor had a value matching the resistance of the liquid sample > > between probes of that size and shape. For each sample, I then > > disconnected the circuit and measured the resistance of the adjustable > > resistor using a DVM. > > The coolant from the van only tested to be good to about -10 F with a > > hydrometer,. so it was not the recommended 50/50 mixture. > > > > 1. coolant from van, probes "dirty"------------ 333 ohms > > 2. coolant from van, probes wiped off--------- 356 ohms > > 3. same coolant, probes sanded lightly, rinsed, wiped--- 365 ohms > > > > 4. 100% Prestone extended life (silicate & phosphate free) --- 1667 ohms > > > > 5. 50-50 mixture Prestone & distilled water from grocery store--- 387 > > ohms > > 6. Tap water (Chicago)------------------------------------------3603 > > ohms > > 7. 50-50 tap water & Prestone ---------------------------------- 384 > > ohms > > 8. distilled water, two different brands, same reading > > ------------47000 ohms > > > > Since I wanted to investigate the statements I had read about the wrong > > mixture triggering the coolant level warning, I wanted to see how high > > the resistance had to be to start the light flashing. Got the digiwife > > to sit up front to report on the flashing and reset periodically by > > turning off the ignition. This test was done with the engine not > > running. I adjusted various potentiometers which I had attached to the > > connector for the level sensor probe until I found that the circuit > > triggered at a resistance of about 42000 ohms. > > This circuitry in my van has been acting correctly for the past month > > or so, although it has had bouts of random unexplained flashing over the > > past year (hence the motivation to gather more info). > > > > My conclusion is that most any mixture of water and antifreeze should be > > sufficient to keep the light from flashing, assuming the rest of the > > bizarre circuitry is working. > > > > Whew. Sorry this is so long. > > > > Larry A. > > 91 GL (no coolant leaks and no flashing...today) >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »