

| Subject: | Re: Larger or additional radiator? |
| From: | Ron Semko |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 22:48:54 -0400 |
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> <P>Agreed. But you have to admit it would the problems with the bleeding and ageing cooling lines in the Vanagon. It would be a more efficient, and easier to maintain system.</P> <P>Ron</P> <P>Orlando, Florida<BR><BR></P></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV>>From: Ari Ollikainen <ARI@OLTECO.COM> <DIV></DIV>>To: Ron Semko <VWBUSPILOT@HOTMAIL.COM>, vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: Larger or additional radiator? <DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:46:55 -0700 <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>At 11:39 PM -0400 7/30/01, Ron Semko wrote: <DIV></DIV>>> <DIV></DIV>>> <DIV></DIV>>>I can tell you this much: those 300/330/350 hp cat desiels do not <DIV></DIV>>>over heat on any mountian or in any climate. <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>> You might not already know this but Diesel engines have a <DIV></DIV>> totally different heat profile than Otto cycle (gasoline) engines. <DIV></DIV>> Consequently, there's little to compare between their cooling <DIV></DIV>> requirements. <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ <DIV></DIV>> You can't depend on your judgement when your imagination is out of <DIV></DIV>>focus. <DIV></DIV>> -- Mark Twain. <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>> OLTECO Ari Ollikainen <DIV></DIV>> P.O. BOX 20088 Networking Architecture and <DIV></DIV>>Technology <DIV></DIV>> Stanford, CA Ari@OLTECO.com <DIV></DIV>> 94309-0088 415.517.3519 <DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »