

| Subject: | Re: Larger or additional radiator? |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Aug 2001 16:17:42 +1200 |
PUHLEEZ shut off your html format! ><html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> ><P>Agreed. But you have to admit it would the problems with the >bleeding and ageing cooling lines in the Vanagon. It would be a more >efficient, and easier to maintain system.</P> ><P>Ron</P> ><P>Orlando, Florida<BR><BR></P></DIV> ><DIV></DIV> ><DIV></DIV>>From: Ari Ollikainen <ARI@OLTECO.COM> ><DIV></DIV>>To: Ron Semko <VWBUSPILOT@HOTMAIL.COM>, >vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM ><DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: Larger or additional radiator? ><DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:46:55 -0700 ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>>At 11:39 PM -0400 7/30/01, Ron Semko wrote: ><DIV></DIV>>> ><DIV></DIV>>> ><DIV></DIV>>>I can tell you this much: those 300/330/350 hp cat >desiels do not ><DIV></DIV>>>over heat on any mountian or in any climate. ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>> You might not already know this but Diesel engines have a ><DIV></DIV>> totally different heat profile than Otto cycle (gasoline) >engines. ><DIV></DIV>> Consequently, there's little to compare between their cooling ><DIV></DIV>> requirements. ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>>_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >_/_/_/_/_/_/ ><DIV></DIV>> You can't depend on your judgement when your imagination >is out of ><DIV></DIV>>focus. ><DIV></DIV>> -- Mark Twain. ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>>_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >_/_/_/_/_/_/ ><DIV></DIV>> ><DIV></DIV>> OLTECO Ari Ollikainen ><DIV></DIV>> P.O. BOX 20088 Networking Architecture and ><DIV></DIV>>Technology ><DIV></DIV>> Stanford, CA Ari@OLTECO.com ><DIV></DIV>> 94309-0088 415.517.3519 ><DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer >at <a >href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><b >r></html>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »