

| Subject: | Re: 009 Distributor in Type IV |
| From: | Tarheel |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2001 17:57:47 -0400 |
The 050 has more degrees advance in it, and it is more or less a 45 degree angle on graph paper. The 009 and other dizzies are all over the place.......and not with the number of total advance degrees available for the type 4 engine. If you use one of these other dizzies, 009, etc., you need to set the total advance to 42-44 degrees. The idle timing will fall where it may. Tarheel 81 westy (2 of them) 74 beetle 73 Transporter (new!!!!!!!) Total resto in progress Vanagon Partsmobiles ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Wellhouse" <maxjoyce@IPA.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:04 AM Subject: Re: 009 Distributor in Type IV > I'm not a disto expert, but I was under the impression that the 050's > advance curve was different(don't know to what degree)but that the 050 > DID'NT have the built in retard for the #3 cylinder so it would run cooler. > Since the oil cooler was moved to the rear of the Type 4 motor, the thinking > was that a centrifugal distributor for that engine wouldn't need the retard. > > My 79 loaf motor had a 009 on it, but it also had dual 44IDF Webers which > likely wouldn't fit under the Vanagon deck lid. After over 100k on the > rebuild, it was the number 4 valve that was failing, but non likely because > of the oil cooler position. I had solid lifters on that engine and a mild > cam. Hindsight tells me next time to only use the 40's. If you run enough > fuel over those valves, they will last a long time. Three things cool that > motor, oil, air AND fuel. > > Dimwitted Moose and FLying Squirrel > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Stevens" <dstevens@TWCNY.RR.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:09 PM > Subject: 009 Distributor in Type IV > > > > this thread seems to have been answered in P-mails and I have the same > > question, > > > > is a 009 bad for a type IV?> I do have in my possession a scat 050 and > > have been told it is a good dist for a engine 1800cc and larger.. any > > knowledgeable feed back would be great. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »