Mike,

It's difficult being in the soft glow (or negative dark) of sheer genius,
ain't it?

Karl Wolz

----- Original Message -----
From: "mike miller" <mwmiller@CWNET.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Is there any way...

> I would really like to comment on this post.  But I can't.  First, ROTF,
> LMAO.  And second I can't think of anything clever enough to compare with
> it.
> Darn.
>
> Mike
>
> > From: Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET>
> > Organization: not likely
> > Reply-To: Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET>
> > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:32:44 -0500
> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> > Subject: Re: Is there any way...
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 Karl "speaks with forked tongue" Wolz sed:
> >>>> Photonic Energy Transfer Rate.
> >> Need I say more?<<
> >
> > Thence replied in kind, John "us idiots?" Baker ...
> >> For us idiots, YES!
> >
> > PETR is related to DST ... Dark Sucker Theory.
> >
> > For years it has been believed that electric bulbs emitted light.
> > However, recent information from Bell Labs has proven otherwise.
> > Electric bulbs don't emit light, they suck dark. Thus they now call
> > these bulbs dark suckers. The dark sucker theory, according to a Bell
> > Labs spokesperson, proves the existence of dark, that dark has mass
> > heavier than that of light, and that dark is faster than light.
> >
> > The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric bulbs suck dark.
> > Take for example, the dark suckers in the room where you are. There is
> > less dark right next to them than there is elsewhere. The larger the
> > dark sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark suckers in a
> > parking lot have a much greater capacity than the ones in this room.
> > As with all things, dark suckers don't last forever. Once they are
> > full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the black
> > spot on a full dark sucker. A candle is a primitive dark sucker. lA
> > new candle has a white wick. You will notice that after the first use,
> > the wick turns black, representing all the dark which has been sucked
> > into it. If you hold a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle,
> > the tip will turn black because it got in the path of the dark flowing
> > into the candle. Unfortunately, these primitive dark suckers have a
> > very limited range. There are also portable dark suckers. The bulbs in
> > these can't handle all of the dark by themselves, and must be aided by
> > a dark storage unit. When the dark storage unit is full, it must be
> > either emptied or replaced before the portable dark sucker can operate
> > again.
> >
> > Dark has mass. When dark goes into a dark sucker, friction from this
> > mass generates heat. Thus it is not wise to touch an operating dark
> > sucker. Candles present a special problem, as the dark must travel in
> > the solid wick instead of through glass. This generates a great amount
> > of heat. Thus it can be very dangerous to touch an operating candle.
> > Dark is also heavier than light. If you swim deeper and deeper, you
> > notice it gets slowly darker and darker. When you reach a depth of
> > approximately fifty feet, you are in total darkness. This is because
> > the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light
> > floats to the top. The immense power of dark can be utilized to mans
> > advantage. We can collect the dark that has settled to the bottom of
> > lakes and push it through turbines, which generate electricity and
> > help push it to the ocean where it may be safely stored. Prior to
> > turbines, it was much more difficult to get dark from the rivers and
> > lakes to the ocean. The Indians recognized this problem, and tried to
> > solve it. When on a river in a canoe travelling in the same direction
> > as the flow of the dark, they paddled slowly, so as not to stop the
> > flow of dark, but when they traveled against the flow of dark, they
> > paddled quickly so as to help push the dark along its way.
> >
> > Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to
> > stand in an illuminated room in front of a closed, dark closet, then
> > slowly open the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the
> > closet, but since the dark is so fast, you would not be able to see
> > the dark leave the closet.
> >
> > In conclusion, Bell Labs stated that dark suckers make all our lives
> > much easier. So the next time you look at an electric bulb remember
> > that it is indeed a dark sucker.
> >
> > see  http://home.netcom.com/~rogermw/darksucker.html
> > for further explanation. but basically, it shows that the Theory of
> > Light
> > is all wrong. all "lights" suck dark, not emit light/photon.
> >
> > somewhat related is the ancient British Automotive conclusion
> > involving
> > the smoke held inside automobile wiring ...
> > see   http://www.ovlr.org/franz/smoke.html
> > for the convincing explanations.
> >
> > or as Socrates used to say, you already knew it; you just forgot it.
> > ;)
> >
> > unca joel
> >