

| Subject: | Re: Engine shot? Odd compression readings |
| From: | David Marshall |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:45:07 -0700 |
Compression tests are a lot like snake oil in my opinion. I am installing a 1.8L "RV" Digifant II motor in a customers 1982 Vanagon (formerly Diesel)(OK, have installed, as of tonight). With the engine on my test stand with a VW Rabbit starter it did 170-170-170-170 PSI across all four - this is with a warm engine (oil at >80C) and a fully charged battery. Installing the engine in the Diesel Vanagon resulted in 205-205-205-200 when it was warm. Why? The Diesel starter sure spins the engine over in a hurry! Also, how many "chugs" do you count before you stop spinning the engine? I count 10. Do you hold the throttle open or closed - there are SO many variables with a compression test. The thing to do is a leak down test along with a compression test - much more meaningful results. David Marshall Fast Forward Automotive Inc. 4356 Quesnel Hixon Road Quesnel BC Canada V2J 6Z3 mailto:info@fastforward.ca <mailto:info@fastforward.ca> http://www.fastforward.ca <http://www.fastforward.ca> Phone: (250) 992 7775 FAX: (250) 992 1160 . Vanagon Accessories and Engine Conversions . Transporter, Unimog and Iltis Sales . European Lighting for most Audi and Volkswagen models -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of Steve Sullivan Sent: September 17, 2001 10:45 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Engine shot? Odd compression readings Just completed my first ever compression check on my 1.9L with 170k on it. Recently had a "bottom end" (why do they call it that?) job of re-ring, new rod bearings, and completely rebuilt heads. Am concerned about the readings I got, need you expert's help diagnosing results. (Not sure I have the cylinder numbers right.) #1 (RR): 152 psi #2 (RF): 115 psi #3 (LR): 160 psi #4 (LF): 131 psi According to friend Bentley, that's mostly within specs: Range Ideal: 145 - 189 My van: 115 - 160 Minimum Ideal: 116 My van: 115 Max difference between highest and lowest Ideal: 44 My van: 45 The two front cylinders are low, the two rear cylinders are OK, all are low. What gives? After re-ringing the pistons, honing the cylinders, and rebuilding the heads (and a great break-in), shouldn't the readings all be correct? Or are my valves out of adjustment (haven't adjusted since assembly, been a couple thousand miles since)? Thanks for the help. Wanted your advice before calling the rebuild shop, so I know what I'm talking about. Steve Calvin, the 84 Westy Steve Sullivan Off the Map Consulting 1326 S. 13th St. Mount Vernon, WA 98274 360-428-7018 steveis@speakeasy.org
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »