

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon de Graff generator? |
| From: | mike miller |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:27:02 -0800 |
You sure you're not Unca Joel in disguise? > From: Chris Smith <chris.smith@AQUILA.NET> > Reply-To: Chris Smith <chris.smith@AQUILA.NET> > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:27:35 -0600 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Vanagon de Graff generator? > > The answer is simple. VW engineers were asked if there was anyway to cut > production costs when designing the 094 tranny. Remember that the late > '70s and early '80s were a rough time for the European economy. They > developed a rather unique solution. Since any automotive designer will > tell you that there is no way that a vanagon could ever possibly power > itself up a hill (do the math yourself if you don't belive me) there must > be a little magic used to make everything work. > > They decided to look into the work of Nickoli Tesla. One of the things he > was working on at the time of his death was a way to transport mater using > high voltage AC current. (some belive that this is where the writers of > Star Trek got the idea, others don't) When the VW engineers saw this > research they new they had found the solution to 2 problems. 1) how to get > a giant box to go 75mph powered by not much more than a large lawn tractor > engine and 2) how to make a 4speed tranny with only 3 gears. > > As you might have guessed by now, providing you haven't deleted this > message yet, the solution was to replace the back half of the input shaft > with a Tesla generator and replace the gear cluster with Tesla > receivers. This system allows the van to be "pushed" along using a form of > mater transmission rather than direct mechanical connection. The problem > with the crackle on your AM radio is not a spark but rather a miss > alignment in the subspacial return when shifting the "gears". To correct > you'll need a Hiesenburg Uncertainty Principal exemption. This should be > available from any quantum physicist. > > > "I'm off to see the lizard" > Chris Smith >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »