

| Subject: | Re: Schr�dinger's Feline |
| From: | mike miller |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:45:58 -0800 |
DEFINITELY female cat > From: Matthew Pollard <poll7356@UIDAHO.EDU> > Reply-To: Matthew Pollard <poll7356@UIDAHO.EDU> > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:08:31 -0800 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Schr�dinger's Feline > > Nope. we don't know the exact state the cat is in, but will lock it into > one state or another when we look at it. So the cat is NEITHER dead or > alive, but just is. > > ---OR--- > > a wavefunction will collapse to one value if it is observed, because the > nature of observing it will effect it. There is no way of observing > somethign without effecting it. Sorry, game over. > > -Matthew > > Matthew Pollard "Racing with the wind and flirting with death > Dept. Of Chemistry So have a cup of coffee and catch your breath" > University of Idaho > www.uidaho.edu/~poll7356 > > > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Gnarlodious wrote: > >> Actually I believe the cat in question is BOTH dead AND alive during the >> experiment (only a feline would be up to this kind of science). >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »