

| Subject: | Re: torque ? |
| From: | David Marshall |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:23:45 -0800 |
Why not just use Nm... 202Nm makes that 149ft-lbs TDI look a lot better ;) David Marshall Fast Forward Automotive Inc. 4356 Quesnel Hixon Road Quesnel BC Canada V2J 6Z3 mailto:info@fastforward.ca <mailto:info@fastforward.ca> http://www.fastforward.ca <http://www.fastforward.ca> Phone: (250) 992 7775 FAX: (250) 992 1160 � Vanagon Accessories and Engine Conversions � Transporter, Unimog and Iltis Sales � European Lighting for most Audi and Volkswagen models -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of Aristotle Sagan Sent: November 19, 2001 5:54 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: torque ? deevide! deevide! deevide! inches to feets. not feets to inches. tim in san jose. >John, > >According to Snap On, multiply by 12. > >Walt Spak >Pittsburgh, PA. >wnsopc3@3rdm.net > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Lunetta 1990 Vanagon GL > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:20 PM > Subject: torque ? > > > Does anyone know how to convert inch pounds to foot pounds? > Thanks, John 1990 vanagon gl _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »