Because I get cornfused with the conversion using metric nautical tons.

tim in san jose

>Why not just use Nm... 202Nm makes that 149ft-lbs TDI look a lot better ;)
>
>David Marshall
> >
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf
>Of Aristotle Sagan
>Sent: November 19, 2001 5:54 PM
>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
>Subject: Re: torque ?
>
>
>deevide! deevide! deevide!
>
>inches to feets. not feets to inches.
>
>tim in san jose.
>
>
>
> >John,
> >
> >According to Snap On, multiply by 12.
> >
> >Walt Spak
> >Pittsburgh, PA.
> >wnsopc3@3rdm.net
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: John Lunetta 1990 Vanagon GL
> >   To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> >   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:20 PM
> >   Subject: torque ?
> >
> >
> >   Does anyone know how to convert inch pounds to foot pounds?
> >   Thanks,  John 1990 vanagon gl
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp