

| Subject: | Re: Found Vanagon With Porsche Engine |
| From: | Ben McCafferty |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:25:51 -0800 |
I don't know the full lineup, but I know the 1977 911T had either a 2.4 or 2.7 in it. I wasn't aware of a 3.2 or 3.4 in 1972. The whole deal sounds sketchy to me. bmc :) "Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...." > From: Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM> > Reply-To: Stan Wilder <wilden1@JUNO.COM> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:18:50 -0600 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Found Vanagon With Porsche Engine > > I found a 1980 Vanagon (in a storage yard) its been there for three > years. The owner will sell it for storage charges of $2400.00. > The Vanagon has a 1972 Porsche 911T engine in it with a 5 speed tranny > and mechanical fuel injection (needs a $1300.00 fuel pump) he says. He > claims it to have a 3.2 Liter engine vs the lesser desirable 3.4 Liter. > All of which means nothing to me. > I'm not knowledgeable on Porsche stuff and the 80 Vanagon body is trash, > the mag wheels were stolen so it comes with 4 concrete blocks and wheels > or tires. > My inquiry into the condition of the engine netted me a buyer beware > response of *it was running before the fuel pump quit*. > Any chance this engine and tranny might be worth the $2400.00 he's > asking? > There are many parts missing from the Vanagon, no heater system, grill, > bumpers, tail lights, cracked windshield, lots of seam rust to match the > rust below every window. At 2600 pounds the body is worth 3.3 cents per > pound less the $75.00 to get it hauled. > I'd curious to know the HP on the engine and likelihood that it might > transfer into a decent 80-83 Vanagon body. > I'd like to hear your comments since everybody knows more about Porsche > than I do. > > Stan Wilder > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »