

| Subject: | Re: A twist on dual-battery configurations |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:02:36 -0500 |
At 08:53 AM 12/21/2001, Jay L Snyder wrote: >How about adding a second alternator for the second battery. It could be >adjusted to charge at a higher voltage if you are using a deep-cycle. Sure. Always good to have redundancy. But until you address the voltage-regulator problem the system is still fundamentally broken, so IMHO better to spend the bucks there first. To reiterate, an automotive-style regulator is intrinsically incapable of *properly* charging any lead-acid battery. It can overcharge or it can undercharge depending on how it is set (usually to undercharge). For starting batteries this is acceptable since starting batteries only use a few per cent of their charge at any time except in emergency -- and in emergency it's considered acceptable if the battery sacrifices itself to get you those last few miles. For deep-cycle batteries which are intended to provide "off-grid" (or "non-running") power an automotive regulator is simply a way to ruin good batteries while providing inferior performance. TANSTAAFL... david -- David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »