

| Subject: | Re: Boston Bobs day at the dyno |
| From: | Mike Hugill |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:50:14 -0500 |
I think we need some more dirty sanchez talk about now. Mike Mike Hugill Principal Recruiter Evergreen Group, Inc. P.O. Box 536 Garrett Park, MD. 20896 (301) 942-8168 mike@evergreengroupinc.com www.evergreengroupinc.com YahooIM: evergreengroupinc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Keller" <kelphoto@ISLANDNET.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:23 PM Subject: Re: Boston Bobs day at the dyno > Hi Bob, > > As you may know I have the adjustable fuel pressure regulator sold by CB > Performance. Currently I run at 45 Psi or 30 psi above atomspheric and > have enjoyed the tweaking of the AFM to accompodate this pressure increase. > > A couple of thoughts I had. One is that the 22d ECU does not set a full > rich mixture at WOT like the the 22 ECU, per Darrell Boehler. Second > the BoECU seems to have a rather slow cycle for high power setting, ie > the fuel mixture stays in the lean part of the specturm too long; rather > that just setting an ideal power mixture of 12:1 vs the more less cycle > 14.7 of stoimetric. The result under sustained WOT was a gradual loss in > RPM as the engine would opperate on the lean side of the gate and as it > moved to richer it would hold RPM then again lose RPM as the leaning > occured-- a rachet effect of losing RPM. I believe the "chip" reverse > this as you observed. My feeling was this may have been an engniering > design to govern the engine's for durability in the light commercial > truck operational profile; better for fleet owners, but not for tweeking power. > > I conducted these test on consistent grade hill climb of about two > miles. The speed and Rpm changes at the finish were compared as I made > changes in my system. My best efforst were open loop and the AFM and > fuel pressure set to deliever a .86 volt reading on the O2 at 4400 RPM > gave me 8 mph more that Closed loop with the same fuel pressue-- a gain > of 12 mph over stock fuel pressure. > > I observed in open loop, without O2 sensor feedback, that the curve on > the AFM wiper signal and spring tension coupled to the ECU RPM/ fuel map > still maintained the O2 voltage within the .3 to .7 volts during > driving. The exceptions being WOT and decel which the injector are > turned off above 2200 RPM or so. I was even able to tune spring tension > and wiper position on the system so that as the vacuum approached the 5" > mark, the fuel mixture began to move above .75 volts to the a maxium > power mixture of .86 volts, and the system would run leaner at beginning > at the 12" inches, to the .3 volts and below- thrilling! My fuel economy > is better at cuise, but less at stop and go. 22 hwy, 17 city, so my > average of 20.5 is down to 19.5-- the price of power. > > Unforuntaely I can't run open loop all of the time. The fine tuning is > ok, but the ECU 22d does not use the TEMP 1 senor, air temperature, to > modify the Fuel map , except at or below freezing, where it then richens > the fuel mixtue 20%. I discussed this with Darrel briefly and he said > older 022 ECU models did not ignore the Temp 1 duining normal > operations, but the 22 D does. The upshot is that seasonal changes and > even daily changes of 10 degress affected my tune at WOT only. More > temperature swings did affect the cruise mixture. > > At this point to be safe, I just take the nominal gain of 4 mph with > closed loop as opposed to an additionl 12 mph open loop at the higher > than stock fuel pressure. The O2 sensor then provides temperature > compensation until temperatures drop to 40 degrees. Then I drop the fuel > pressue a touch in the winter to avoid the chugging that occure due to > the Temp 1/ ECU low tempertaure adjustment; it still happens but for > less that 15 seconds or so, compare to a minute or more if I let the > fuel pressure stay at the summer settings. The system also passed > emmisions testing with the higher fuel pressure and closed loop. For > the cost of the fuel pressure regularor, and new fuel lines, clamps and > my labor, I feel this is a good way to increase performance and as you > mentioned, fuel mixture is one that many owner's overlook. > > In the future I'd like to get an older 022 ECU that goes WOT, and uses > the TEMP 1 senor during normal operation to experiment with. BTW I've > written more about these issues and timing as well, I'm at 45 BTDC at > 3000 and premium gas, Chevron 91, in the archives, just search under my name. > > Sincerely, > > Mark Keller > 91 Carat >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »