

| Subject: | Re: Subject: Fuel octane |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:06:43 -0600 |
Well, Unca Joel. Tax time is coming up and I'm sure glad you're not keeping my books. With absolute accurate records like yours the IRS would decide right away that I was hiding something. Stan On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:14:53 -0600 Joel Walker <jwalker17@EARTHLINK.NET> writes: > > All of this should be considered along with the driving > environment. > It > > seems that an engine under higher and prolonged loads, such as a > > hill-climbing Westy, is probably going to benefit from the more > expensive > > gasoline. > > in my experience, the octane makes no difference in MY buses ... not > a > nickel's worth of difference. over the years, i've tried to even up > the tankfuls of the three octanes available in my area, just for > testing purposes. but since i'm cheap, the 87 octane usually has > twice > as many tankfuls as the other two octanes. ;) > > here's the results ... > > 1988 Vanagon > Thursday 27 Dec 2001 Page > 1 > > Brand Oct Tanks Gals Cost Miles MPG $/g $/mi > Amoco R87 46 592.0 654.38 12,077.3 20.4 1.11 0.05 > Bp R87 46 574.5 627.48 11,577.0 20.2 1.09 0.05 > Chevron R87 46 617.6 689.15 12,214.0 19.8 1.12 0.06 > Exxon R87 46 617.5 679.13 12,270.3 19.9 1.10 0.06 > Shell R87 46 595.6 665.00 11,553.2 19.4 1.12 0.06 > Unocal R87 43 580.1 618.57 11,418.2 19.7 1.07 0.05 > Z-other R87 2 27.0 28.62 533.6 19.8 1.06 0.05 > Z-start R87 1 15.7 14.10 0.0 0.0 0.90 > 14.10 > Total 276 3,620.0 3,976.43 71,643.6 19.8 1.10 0.06 > > Amoco R89 23 300.2 343.26 5,774.0 19.2 1.14 0.06 > Bp R89 23 313.6 367.39 6,231.3 19.9 1.17 0.06 > Chevron R89 24 309.1 375.84 6,283.3 20.3 1.22 0.06 > Exxon R89 23 297.8 345.06 5,655.4 19.0 1.16 0.06 > Shell R89 23 301.6 353.11 5,997.0 19.9 1.17 0.06 > Unocal R89 21 269.1 311.73 5,332.1 19.8 1.16 0.06 > Total 137 1,791.4 2,096.39 35,273.1 19.7 1.17 0.06 > > Amoco P92 25 333.5 440.92 6,605.9 19.8 1.32 0.07 > Bp P92 25 308.9 397.89 6,139.3 19.9 1.29 0.06 > Chevron P92 25 316.2 418.87 6,377.1 20.2 1.32 0.07 > Citgo P92 1 9.7 15.52 101.7 10.5 1.60 0.15 > Exxon P92 25 315.5 410.99 6,427.0 20.4 1.30 0.06 > Shell P92 25 325.5 413.68 6,561.0 20.2 1.27 0.06 > Unocal P92 21 274.1 349.98 5,581.4 20.4 1.28 0.06 > Z-other P92 1 3.5 4.28 55.6 15.9 1.22 > 0.08 > Total 148 1,886.9 2,452.13 37,849.0 20.1 1.30 0.06 > > Totals 561 7,298.3 8,524.95 144,765.7 > Averages per Tank 13.0 15.20 258.0 19.8 1.17 0.06 > > the z-start is the very first tank i put into the bus. i separated > it > out like that to keep from lowering the stats for the brand/octane. > z-other is off-brands that i used over the years ... when i > couldn't > find a station that i had a credit card for. :) > > to my untrained statistical eye, there ain't a bit of difference > between them. now, it LOOKS like the premium is slightly higher. > and > if you didn't know me, you'd think that, too ... but my tendency is > to > fill up with premium only before a trip, so the mpg is a bit > skewed > that way: the 91/92/93 (all condensed into 92 octane) gets a tad > more > highway miles than, say, the 87 octane (which gets used mostly on > around-town trips). > and i don't think that 0.5 mpg would be a 'significant' result, in > this more-or-less unscientific test of mine. too many variables, i > think. :) > > anyway, as far as i'm concerned, in MY buses, using the gasolines > available in MY area of the country, and with MY driving style, > there > ain't enough difference to warrant use of the more expensive > gasolines. > > so why do i do it? :) old habits die hard ... i kinda semi sorta > somewhat think or believe that maybe, just maybe, the higher octane > fuels 'clean' the injectors or something. oh, and i'm trying to be > fair in the test. yeah, that's it! ;) > > unca joel > 1988 GL > 1987 GL Camper > 1991 Carat > ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »