

| Subject: | I see. Thanks. RE: Shouldn't the listsrv set the reply to vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com? |
| From: | John Hawk |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:21:56 -0600 |
Yes I see what you mean. Thanks. >>> "Carrington, Tom" <TCarrington@ReliTech.com> 12/28 9:19 AM >>> Hi John, Trust me, it's better this way. We used to have the default reply set to the list address, and I lost count of how many times responses that were supposed to be delivered personally were shared with the entire list. Although a few times it was kinda entertaining! :o TomC tcarrington@relitech.com http://volksweb.relitech.com 85 VW Vanagon Crew Cab 82 VW Westy Diesel=>Gas Conversion 81 Checker A-11 (Taxi) 65 VW Notchback -----Original Message----- From: John Hawk [mailto:jhawk@HAWKCOMPUTING.COM] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:04 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Shouldn't the listsrv set the reply to vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com? I think we are all missing valuable replies to posts since when we hit reply the reply is to the orginal sender. I have been manually changing the reply to address. John
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »