

| Subject: | Re: higher octane needs |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:18:53 -0600 |
Eloquent statement of little known facts........ I agree. Stan Wilder On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 19:47:43 +0000 Paul Mayfield <paulmayfield@EARTHLINK.NET> writes: > Please correct me if any of this is untrue/incorrect! > > Bentley states on the back cover: > ----------------------------- > Gasoline octane requirement > US Cost of Living rating (CLC)...87 > CLC rating method. (RON+MON)/2 = 87 > MON = Motor Octane Number > RON = Research Octane Number > ----------------------------- > As far as Vanagon engines are concerned, > regular 87 octane gas has more energy than high octane > gas and produces more power -in a stock engine- > because it is not diluted with additives that produce > much less energy than raw gas. > > The only difference between High octane and Regular > are additives: anti-knock and cleaning agents. > > As far as I know (and I may be wrong on this) Vanagon > engines with digifant do not have the capability to make > use of high octane gas. I've heard some high performance > high compression engines have preignition sensors > that adjust to lower power levels when 87 octane is used. > (porsche,corvette?) > > I have a friend who owns a Chevron station. > He has a stable of very expensive collector cars- all > paid for with profits from overpriced premium gas. > Suckers, he calls em. 30 cents a gallon suckers. > > Flamesuit on. > > ========================================= >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »