

| Subject: | Re: wbx reliabilty |
| From: | mike miller |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Feb 2002 08:27:12 -0800 |
Scum bag indifferent owner! Also a 'different' owner. Mike Changes oil regularly and is saving up for the needed engine rebuild/swap > From: Ben T <BenTbtstr8@AOL.COM> > Reply-To: BenTbtstr8@AOL.COM > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 05:54:49 EST > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: wbx reliabilty > > In a message dated 2/17/02 2:20:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, > andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ writes: > > << A decent modern engine can be driven hard and given minimal > maintenance (including, for the lazy, much-longer-than-advised > oilchange intervals) yet be very reliable. Subarus & Toyotas, for > instance. VW's wasserboxer unfortunately doesn't fit this bill. >>> > > > OK at the risk of getting flamed as an indifferent owner, I must admit that I > have driven my 87 2.1 WBX w/o an oil change, waterpump change, or much of > anything else in the past 50,000 miles. Those of you in the SF Bay Area may > notice a Metallic Beige (gold or something) 87 GL popping in and out of > traffic. Fat wheels front and back. That would be my 200,000 mile plus on the > original heads and headgasket daily driver. > > I've been trying to kill the bastard so I swap in a healthier powerplant. She > keeps thwarting my efforts. I may have jinxed myself. Now I will have to > consider an oilchange. > > BenT > to destroy >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »