

| Subject: | Re: distilled water & wbx reliabilty |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:57:00 -0500 |
At 04:22 PM 2/18/2002, John P. Flaherty wrote: >Ok, my degree is in business and computers, not science, so I'm certainly >not an expert, but doesn't water that goes "down the drain" end up back in >the water supply? If so, in the long term, how is it wasted? I think it depends on just how "long-term" you're looking at. Also, taking municipal water that's already been stored, treated, distributed -- none of it for free -- and throwing three fourths of it back into the waste-treatment stream unused is a rather expensive proposition if done in volume. It's very easy to make water undrinkable -- not nearly so easy to make it drinkable again. There's a lot of water in the world, but comparatively little of it is fresh, and comparatively little of that is available for use. Here are some figures from http://www.pbs.org/kteh/cadillacdesert/water.html: >If all the planet's water fit in a gallon jug, available fresh water would >equal only about a tablespoon. About 93 percent of the planet's water is >seawater; another 2 percent is locked in ice-caps and glaciers; vast >reserves of fresh water underlie the planet's surface, but much of it is >too deep to economically tap. > >The earth's total allotment of water has a volume of about 344 million >cubic miles. Of this: > > * 315 million cubic miles (93%) is sea water! > * 9 million cubic miles (2.5%) is in aquifers deep below the earth's > surface; > * 7 million cubic miles (2%) is frozen in polar ice caps; > * 53,000 cubic miles of water pass through the planet's lakes and > streams; > * 4,000 cubic miles of water is atmospheric moisture; > * 3,400 cubic miles of water are locked within the bodies of living > things. And of the available fresh water, the great bulk of it is in Canada and Russia. Doesn't leave much for California, which gets a *lot* of water from out of state. Do a google on "water wars history" and you'll find some interesting stuff. >As population increases, so does the demand for fresh, safe water. >According to the U.S. Geological Survey, water use in the United States >alone increased from 330 million gallons a day in 1980 to 408 million >gallons a day in 1990--a huge leap despite a decade of considerable >water-rationing. <snip> >Agriculture accounts for the bulk of U.S. water use. The average American >consumes 1,500 pounds of food each year. 1,000 gallons of water are >required to grow and process each pound of that food. This means that in >this country, in a single year, an average of 1.5 million gallons of water >is invested in the food eaten by just one person. This >200,000-cubic-feet-plus of water-per-person would be enough to cover a >football field four feet deep. And irrigation water is a particular difficulty because much of its salt content remains in the soil, making it gradually saltier and saltier until it becomes difficult to grow crops on it. >Industry comes in second with an estimated 28 billion gallons of fresh >water used everyday--that's seven trillion gallons per year--to make the >products that are part of our everyday life: > > * 50,000 gallons are required to produce the rayon for an average > living room carpet; > * 40,000 gallons to produce steel for one automobile; 518 gallons for > one tire; > * 1,500 gallons to process a barrel of beer; > * 100 gallons to make a pound of cotton; > * 55 gallons to make one pound of synthetic rubber; > * 24 gallons to make one pound of plastic. Not a simple problem. In the case of small reverse-osmosis devices, the makers judge that customers will be more willing to waste water than to pay the significant extra costs for units with higher recovery rates. david -- David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »