I bow to your superior wisdom.

William

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cary Chiang" <cchiang1@YAHOO.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: distilled water & wbx reliabilty

> William:
> Letting threads run their course can certainly lead to increased
information.  Unfortunately, it can also lead to whole lot of gibberish not
*directly* related to the question asked.  It also tends to quickly drift
away from being "Vanagon-related" content, which is what the vast majority
of readers are here for.  Lastly, it just fills up the archives, and makes
searching for information there take longer than necessary.  As the
originator of the recent, (in)famous **Vegetarian** post, you should know
some of this.  How many "unseen wrinkles" got ironed out of that debacle?
> Cary
>   developtrust <developtrust@home.com> wrote: What it has to do with wbx
reliability is the creation and evolution of a
> spirit of community generated by sharing outside the box. Or should I say
> outside the loaf. If threads are allowed to run their course often unseen
> wrinkles get ironed out. I've learned a lot of vanagon related information
> from this thread so far.
>
> William Polowniak
> 1989 Vanagon GL
> 1988 Mercedes 300 SE
>
> > Listees:
> >
> > Are we about done with this thread, yet? Yes, we all know that water
> > is important in all of our lives, but what does the wastage of it,
> > William's utility bill, or the % of fresh versus salt water have to do
> with
> > wbx reliability (other than the first few posts regarding deionized vs.
> > distilled vs. etc...?
> >
> > Cary
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games