

| Subject: | Re: Subaru wbx reliability |
| From: | mike miller |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:56:45 -0800 |
A plain rebuild, good quality, runs about $3000 including R&R here in Sacramento. This sounds like a good deal. Mike > From: developtrust <developtrust@HOME.COM> > Reply-To: developtrust <developtrust@HOME.COM> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:40:48 -0800 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Subaru wbx reliabilty > > Ken, > I really enjoy your comments and perspective. I love the "look" of the > Subaru engines of which I have seen photos, but I think I would go with one > of those rebuilt engines that James Lutz 503-233-0030 makes up in Portland. > Is there anyone like James in the San Diego area who does similar work? > > James Lutz fine tunes his rebuilt engines and balances everything everywhere > for more power and so on. He says he can give your Vanagon more power > without ANY loss of reliability. His best engine is "Better than NEW! Fully > spin balanced, Reman & balanced Con-rods, New camshaft & GERMAN followers, > New GERMAN oil pump, New graphited Brazil/MAHLE Pistons & cyl. Balanced > (Kobelschmit avail. by request), Child's & Albert "Z-Gap" Rings, Full GERMAN > Kobelschmit Bearings, New heads with 3-angle grind,...$3,000.00+shipping " > And another for $2.000 plus shipping without some of the upgrades above. > > If I were more mechanically inclined I'd do the work myself, but often I > have found that a skilled mechanic who has the proper tools and experience > is cheaper in the long run. > > William Polowniak > 1989 Vanagon GL > 1988 Mercedes 300 SE > > Subject: Re: Subaru wbx reliabilty > > >> I really feel that the Subaru (sp?) conversion is for those of us in the >> Vanagon world who actually are more sado-machistic (sp?) than normal. I > mean >> all of us own at least one Vanagon which shows that we enjoy pain or > perhaps >> just the occasional adventure. However the folks with the Subie motors > take >> the cake as far as I am concerned. >> >> 1. You have this crazy complicated wiring harness which is like 12 feet > long >> that you have to unravel first. Many of the weak never make it through > this >> initial rite of passage. You see their shattered dreams in a FS post to > the >> list or on ebay. >> >> 2. After you get past this first hurdle, you still have a used engine. >> Unless you actually drove the Subie, who knows what abuses it has already >> endured. At least you knew the problems that your waterboxer had. Now > you >> have someone elses problems. >> >> 3. Many of the folks that I have talked to who have done this conversion > do >> not describe their ownership of a Subie powered Vanagon as "carefree", or >> "low maintenance". Two folks I have spoken with had their great, reliable >> Subie-boxer lock up on them due to lack of oil. Several others have >> described exhaust crack chasing, and the idea that your conversion is > never >> really done, you are always tweaking something or redesigning something. >> >> 4. In spite of all of this none of the people who I have talked to, who > have >> done this conversion were really unhappy with it. (Which just goes to > show >> how warped we all really are:-). >> >> So if you enjoy tinkering, or adventures and want more power, then go for > it. >> But the reliability is really just an illusion. Just my opinion. Feel >> free to comment. >> >> Thanks, >> Ken Wilford >> John 3:16 >> http://www.vanagain.com >> Phone: (856)-327-4936 >> Fax: (856)-327-2242 >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »