

| Subject: | Re: Loss of power at altitude |
| From: | Aaron Reams |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:50:18 -0800 |
Yes, I definitely agree. However, I should of been more specific when I posted my question. I realize atmospheric pressure and oxygen content play a big role in compression, but I should of pointed out that this was IMHO an abnormal loss of power. In fact, I was passed by another vanagon on one of the uphill climbs. It was a nice looking syncro *drool* and I don't know what he had under the hood ;-), but he definitely passed me with ease. Many thanks to all who have replied so far!! Aaron -85GL -----Original Message----- From: Frank Grunthaner [mailto:FrankGRUN@AOL.COM] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:46 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Loss of power at altitude In a message dated 3/11/02 5:43:04 PM, wolzphoto@worldnet.att.net writes: << While it's nice to discuss theory, it most likely didn't do him any good with his problem. >> Karl, NOT THEORY, just empirical engineering facts. Denigrating these discussions by terming them theoretical discussions does no justice to the engineering explanation nor to the real contributions to science and engineering made by theory. The original poster's comparison as I read it was with other vehicles. Frank Grunthaner
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »