

| Subject: | Re: On Longevity, Displacement, Efficiency and Technology in Conversions |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:30:47 +1200 |
>There is more religion and snake oil in this topic - exhausting (pun >intended). For years people have been promulgating the BS of higher >technology Japanese engines over German, American, British and Korean. Now, I >do understand that fact probably has no place in this discussion, but tough. >A B&W comparison can be made readily for any engine, so long as the same >numbers are used in the comparison. The best comparison of any set of engines >comes from a comparison of the Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP) for the >engine. This is in essence the peak torque normalized by the displacement >with a few constants thrown in for good measure. This is largely established >by combustion chamber design and the efficiency of hot air generation >(combustion and heat transfer to the compressed air charge). Now the very >best comparison can be made with the torque curve (torque vs. rpm) but the >Japanese are too ashamed of their engine performance to publish these >figures, they only release (Subarea) the peak torque and HP numbers. What c**p. Also, Subaru certainly does publish torque/power graphs. I have a copy somewhere on my Mac of the Impreza WRX STi Type RA graph (280ps) ...
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »