

| Subject: | Re: On Longevity,Displacement,Efficiency and Technology in Conversions |
| From: | Nancy Eilers-Hughes |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Mar 2002 10:00:59 -0700 |
Uhmmm...I notice you excised the qualifier regarding increase in cross-sectional area. So it is your contention that a Vanagon without the radiator (as in covered over) has significantly less drag than one *with* a radiator? Right. Keith Hughes Kim Howe wrote: > > On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 10:54 AM, Nancy Eilers-Hughes wrote: > > > > And why do you think the radiator has drag? > > I was trying to have an intelligent conversation here ;-) > > Go check some facts then we'll talk. > > Kim
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »