Yes, I meant cubic cm, not cubic cc.. but I think MOST people got the
point... didn't you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf
Of Ben McCafferty
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:16 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: cubic cubic centimeters WAS: Re: This is not the forum...

Now, the question is:  is a cubic cc 9 times the size of a normal cc?  Or 27
times?  If so, maybe we've finally solved the underpowered Vanagon
problem....  :)
bmc  :)
"Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...."

> OW!  MY TOES!
>
> Now about the engine... I give you the hypocrite-special... $1 per cubic
cc.
> Your choice!
>