

| Subject: | Re: E-bay Scam Trend (Caveat emptor) |
| From: | Jere Hawn |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:24:05 -0700 |
Dave, I asked the guy about how fishy it looked and that since he was bidding against himself I would only give him half of what he was asking. He said I was right and sold at my asking price. In short I asked him and he told me Jere -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of DaveC Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 7:47 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: E-bay Scam Trend (Caveat emptor) >The event: I saw a pair of rear hatch struts and bid on them >for $25 (volks >cafe has them on special for $12.50 ea) and I was out bid, and the sellers >minimum was not reached. Auction finally ends and time passes (I'm not >watching the item) and I get this pmail saying that the item didn't sell and >was wondering if I would like to buy them. I said NO! not at $32 > >Learning Point: Seller have been known to set their minimum selling price >so high that the item will not sell and then they re-approach buyers to see >if they want to buy off-line at the higher price. Another tactic that I >seen used is that they bid against their own item under a different name to >drive the price up and when they win the then go the next highest bidder to >sell at an inflated price (off-line to boot) How do you know that these persons bid against themselves? Unless someone squeals on them, how does this come to light? Dave -- Dave Carpenter Whatever you wish for me, May you have twice as much. "Sometimes I think we're alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we're not. In either case the idea is quite staggering." -- Arthur C. Clarke
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »