| Subject: | Re: The Better Waterboxer Motor....the simpler 1.9L or the 2.1L with all ofth... |
| From: | Jeff Sibley |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2002 02:00:37 EDT |
In a message dated 4/22/02 10:56:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, TSmola@TRIBUNE.COM writes: > It seems that the 1.9L motor. with 82 bhp , while less powerful than the > 2.1L w/ 95 bhp.....is alot less complicated with coolant hoses, failure > prone waterpumps and thermostats...... you with your 1.9 banger....obviously don't understand the "incredible, mind blowing, powerful, g-forced" rush of driving a floored 2.1 litre boxer,........ uphill. ;)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »