

| Subject: | Re: [Syncro] Re: New Engine Needed |
| From: | Brent Christensen |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:35:54 -0700 |
I would certainly expect that if the engine were *truly* reconditioned and "rebuilt" (not just put back together with new parts) it should last a LOT longer than 22k miles! If you want to go the WBX route, I would have to suggest one of the known quality rebuilders out there like Boston Engine. Other than that, I must admit that the Subaru transplant seems to meet most, if not all of your stated requirements. I would probably never be able to go this route myself, because my trusted mechanic would no longer want to work on my Syncro. If I had more free time and did not rely on his services for almost all repairs and upkeep on my Syncro, I would be seriously investigating the Subaru conversion. (I am embarassed to admit that he even does my oil changes, despite the fact that I own almost all the tools to even rebuild the engine!) It boils down to a choice of spending time with my kids and paying a mechanic to maintain the Syncro. ;-) My $0.02 worth. Brent Christensen >From: "Andrew Bell" <andrewbell@qwest.net> >Reply-To: andrewbell@qwest.net >To: "Cookson, Noel" <ncookson@CELOXNETWORKS.COM>, >" syncro@yahoogroups.com" <syncro@yahoogroups.com> >CC: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: [Syncro] Re: New Engine Needed >Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:45:08 -0500 > >What about the HP WBX from Colorado? Plug and play... > >AB > >"Cookson, Noel" wrote: > > > Bad news: my rebuilt 2.1 blew out this week after only 22.5K miles (160K >on > > chassis). > > > > I am committed to this van - bought it new in '88 - and want to do the >power > > plant right this time. The last two days have been spent searching the > > archives trying to come up with the best solution. A lot has been >learned > > but not enough to make my final decision - I need help from this group. > > > > The following engine options are under consideration: > > > > Rebuild (hesitate to do this since the last rebuild was good for just >22.5K > > miles plus leaky heads, expensive exhaust system, weak water pump). > > Subaru Conversion > > golf/jetta I4 conversion > > Tiico > > TDI conversion > > Open to other suggestions > > > > Below are the requirements this new engine should meet. Obviously all of >the > > options listed below can be achieved with enough effort but I am looking >for > > the solution that will meet these requirements in the simplest (not > > necessarily cheapest) way. > > 1) Closed loop engine management system. > > 2) Digifant or better fuel injection system > > 3) Stock tach and gauges work > > 4) Stock AC, Power steering bolt on. > > 5) More reliable than a stock 2.1 WBX > > 6) Compatible with stock cruise control > > 7) Serviceable by me and acceptable to competent mechanics > > 8) Engine parts are generally available > > 9) Same or better power/gas mileage as stock 2.1 > > 10) Cost under $5000 (including labor) > > > > Here are the questions I have: > > > > 1) Which of the engine options comes closest to meeting these > > requirements? > > 2) Is there an engine option that cannot meet a requirement? > > For example one might guess the TDI conversion will cost more > > than $5000. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help! > > > > Noel '88 GL _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »