Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: TIICO vs. hot rod WBX
From:Vanagon man
Date:Sat, 27 Apr 2002 07:04:11 -0400

Boston Bob's motor was getting 18+ I believe he mentioned.............who
stated 15 mph?  That motor is a stock FI system, why would it burn more
fuel?   Boston Bob made it "breathe" better by increasing valve
size.........thus it appeared to have a serious gain in HP and torque over
the stock motor .

  A fair comparison is a 2 liter type 4 engine in a bus vs. a 2 liter engine
in a Porshe 914...Both type 4 engines, both look the same except the Porsche
engine has much better heads leading to the HP gains...................

Adam P

81 Vanagon Westy (The Brick)
70 Single Cab "Whitey"
74 Beetle "Ol Yeller"
73 Transporter (STILL at paint shop)
1988 Vanagon Wolfsburg
Used Vanagon Parts for sale (mostly aircooled)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry E. Muller" <bmuller@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: TIICO vs. hot rod WBX

> > Now, based on an average gas mileage of 20 for TIICO, assumed 15 (does
> > anyone know?) for Bob's motor, gas cost of $1.40 per gallon and 12000
miles
> > traveled a year, Boston Bob's Big-valve Boxer will cost $280 more in gas
per
> > year to operate.  This means it will take about 3 years for Tiico's
improved
> > mileage to pay off.
>
> 15 MPG ??? Is this for real?  I assume the base BB rebuild gets the same
as the
> original engine (ca 19 mpg).
>
> Oh well - its nice to have choices.
>