

| Subject: | Re: TIICO vs. hot rod WBX |
| From: | Vanagon man |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Apr 2002 07:04:11 -0400 |
Boston Bob's motor was getting 18+ I believe he mentioned.............who stated 15 mph? That motor is a stock FI system, why would it burn more fuel? Boston Bob made it "breathe" better by increasing valve size.........thus it appeared to have a serious gain in HP and torque over the stock motor . A fair comparison is a 2 liter type 4 engine in a bus vs. a 2 liter engine in a Porshe 914...Both type 4 engines, both look the same except the Porsche engine has much better heads leading to the HP gains................... Adam P 81 Vanagon Westy (The Brick) 70 Single Cab "Whitey" 74 Beetle "Ol Yeller" 73 Transporter (STILL at paint shop) 1988 Vanagon Wolfsburg Used Vanagon Parts for sale (mostly aircooled) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry E. Muller" <bmuller@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:14 PM Subject: Re: TIICO vs. hot rod WBX > > Now, based on an average gas mileage of 20 for TIICO, assumed 15 (does > > anyone know?) for Bob's motor, gas cost of $1.40 per gallon and 12000 miles > > traveled a year, Boston Bob's Big-valve Boxer will cost $280 more in gas per > > year to operate. This means it will take about 3 years for Tiico's improved > > mileage to pay off. > > 15 MPG ??? Is this for real? I assume the base BB rebuild gets the same as the > original engine (ca 19 mpg). > > Oh well - its nice to have choices. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »