

| Subject: | Re: Synthetic motor oil, Superstition and Witch Trials |
| From: | developtrust |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:00:32 -0700 |
Good explanation. Thanks. Makes sense. William > > In a message dated 4/27/02 6:01:07 PM, developtrust@COX.NET writes: > > << Like I said it is most likely a myth like needing to rotate radial tires > > only front to back. We now know that we can rotate radial tires any which > > way and I believe we can break an engine in better with synthetic oil. >> > > Ahem! There is no reason to invoke superstition or animal sacrifice (i.e. > belief) to explain or interpret well understood technical processes. The > break-in process involves bringing the surface finish of the cylinder walls > and the piston rings to a compatible level (RMS roughness modulated by > differences in the Young's Modulus for the two or more different materials). > This is accomplished in three generic ways: > > 1). Add an abrasive (Al2O3, SiC, aluminosilicates, particulate carbon etc.), > mix with good dispersing lubricant and polish away. Works poorly with modern > engines and neanderthal consumers. > > 2). Assemble the engine, provide a lubricant with adequate or marginal film > strength properties, but with extensive dispersant additives. Run engine for > break-in time. Variable speeds and load conditions are needed to get the > broadest surface finish match between ring and cylinder wall. Here, low film > strength oils are by definition paraffin or natural stock based. True > break-in oils have very poor film strength and are heavily sulfurated for > good capture of microparticles. These microparticle suspensions can lead to > extensive wear if the lubricant is not changed out in time. > > 3). Using current (read here expensive) machining and polishing techniques, > prepare the cylinder bore so that at the end of machining (multiple rebore, > reaming and polishing, followed by anneal and polish) the ring and wall > combination are as well matched as would be achieved after optimal versions > of step 2. Higher ticket, low volume manufacturers (Porsche, Lexus, others) > use this approach and can afford to deliver their product with high film > strength oils (read synthetic here) and forgo the break-in ritual. > > So ---- use synthetics from the start in a mass market vehicle (VW, Audi, > etc) and the surfaces will mate in 4 to 15 times the net piston surface > lapping (translates as 4 to 15 times more miles for break-in with synthetic > oil vs. natural stocks). Use synthetics to break-in a remanufactured block > from a rebuilder - we could go to Europa and Titan and return before .... > > No myth, no legend, just engineering, tribology and materials science. After > all we are in the 21st century! > > Frank Grunthaner
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »