

| Subject: | Boston Bob's web site |
| From: | gary hradek |
| Date: | Thu, 2 May 2002 12:29:09 -0700 |
Bill,
Now I do not recall boston bob say anything about
the world being flat, yet. Most engine rebuilders
see the worst of what we do to our engines. I agree
that 87 octane will work well with our vanagon,
however if you advance the engine to get that extra
power you should take boston bob's advise and use the
higher octane. It may prevent boston bob from seeing
your engine quite so soon. gary
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 12:44:09 -0400
From: wb6otg <wb6otg@INTREX.NET>
Subject: Re: What Octane Fuel
A stock Vanagon will run fine on regular gas. Some of
the information
on Boston Bob's web site is just plain wrong.
I think its time to pull this out of the archives and
dust it off:
Here's the story on octane: At one time (up til the
early '70s?),
there
were two ways to measure octane, research octane
(based on lab work
with
the fuel) and another system (I forget the name)
based on tests in an
actual engine. The two systems usually give somewhat
different
numbers. Most car makers (including VW) specified
research octane,
often
listed as R.O.N. (Research Octane Number?). The US
government, in its
usual wisdom, decided that since people couldn't
agree on a method,
they
should invent a third one! So, when the government
started requiring
that octane be marked on the gas pump, it was
required that the two
existing methods be averaged to come up with a number
(the fine print
on
the sticker even reads (R+M)/2.
So, when VW calls out 91 R.O.N., as the gas flap
sticker on my Jetta
and
the owner's manual for my Vanagon both do, that is
the same (more or
less) as the US gas pump number of 87, which is the
usual number for
regular in most areas.
Bill
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.comHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »