Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Tires Michelin Agilis vs LTX M/S
From:Mark Dorm
Date:Fri, 10 May 2002 13:55:55 -0700

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>When I bought my van, there were four tires rated at 92 sized 195 from Pep Boys, Futura. I side swiped one of these tires, ruined it, put on the spare, a Michelin, and the Michelin seperated, which is what you experienced. <BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: Stan Wilder <WILDEN1@JUNO.COM>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Reply-To: Stan Wilder <WILDEN1@JUNO.COM>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: Re: Tires Michelin Agilis vs LTX M/S
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:27 -0500
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I've been running Michelin 61s 185x14, the recommended tire size for my
<DIV></DIV>&gt;83 Westfalia.(5300 pounds)
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I'd think that with lighter weight Vanagons 2900/3200 pounds that the 51s
<DIV></DIV>&gt;would be OK.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I'm pleased with the 61s since I've got about 8k on them and they are not
<DIV></DIV>&gt;showing any wear on the 5000 mile rotation.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I find that the stiff sidewall makes the tires a little noisy on
<DIV></DIV>&gt;expansion joints but keep the sway and wind wash down to a minimum.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;There are probably other tires that are just as good or possibly even
<DIV></DIV>&gt;better but I think I'd buy the Agilis a second time if they continue to
<DIV></DIV>&gt;be as good as they have been so far.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Some folks have found tires at CostCo that are comparable in the C &amp; D
<DIV></DIV>&gt;rating at a lower price and there are other that want a more aggressive
<DIV></DIV>&gt;tire for Snow, Rain and Off Road that have found the more suitable tires
<DIV></DIV>&gt;for their needs.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I often go off road on camping trips and all previous Michelin tires
<DIV></DIV>&gt;separated at about 10K. I'm talking about new tires that met the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;specifications of minimum inflation and weight capacity.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Stan Wilder
<DIV></DIV>&gt;83 Air Cooled Westfalia
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;On Thu, 9 May 2002 21:39:42 -0700 Mark Dorm <MARK_HB@HOTMAIL.COM>writes:
<DIV></DIV>&gt;http://tires.michelin-us.com/mastapp/servlet/Controller/site.catalog.Resu
<DIV></DIV>&gt;lts?vehicletype=templatedata%2Fcatalog%2Fvehicle_type%2Fdata%2FTruckandVa
<DIV></DIV>&gt;n&amp;wheelsize=any&amp;specificuse=any&amp;vehicletypename=truck%2Fvan&amp;wheelsizename
<DIV></DIV>&gt;=any&amp;specificusename=any&amp;flag=1
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;This Michelin site is ranking the LTX M/S better than the Agilis. And
<DIV></DIV>&gt;note that when you search under size 14 inch wheels, only the LTX M/S
<DIV></DIV>&gt;pops up, and when you type in 15 inch wheels, LTX M/S, other LTX's, and
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Agilis pops up. I almost ordered Agilis and I was told it would be a two
<DIV></DIV>&gt;month wait, so I didn't buy anything. Note that Vanagon.com tire page
<DIV></DIV>&gt;mentions the Agilis 81 but not the 61, this is a mix up isn't it? The 61
<DIV></DIV>&gt;is made for the Vanagon, the 81 exceeds Vanagon specs, and made Frank of
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Stebro unhappy, though he had bad u-joints..., some other guy said he had
<DIV></DIV>&gt;81's and he liked 'em.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Anyway, aren't the LTX M/S under-weighted for our vans? This current
<DIV></DIV>&gt;version of Michelins site doesn't make this an easy answer. There are
<DIV></DIV>&gt;more specs that don't mean anything to me than there are stars in the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;heavens.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <a href='http://g.msn.com/1HM105401/43'>Click Here</a><br></html>