

| Subject: | Re: Safety of the Vanagon |
| From: | DaveC |
| Date: | Tue, 14 May 2002 20:55:16 -0700 |
>I hope this isn't a tired thread, and if this has been done a ton of times >and is archived, just let me know where I can look at them, and I will. > >--- > >So my biggest hindrance to buying my van was the safety factor. I talked to >mechanics and their response to my concerns was, "Just don't hit anything." > >Sound advice if you ask me. > >But I kept looking and found the Volvo/Van crash photos where the van >demolished the volvo. That was comforting. Then I drove them and I >actually feel quite safe since I'm so high up. It's a joy to drive, and I >feel like I've been a safer, more defensive driver, since I started, but I'm >still wondering how these things do in real life crashes. In that same thread, I contributed this: >But I'm astounded to find this information on Folksam's (the Swedish >insurance company) web site: it rates the 80-91 Caravelle (that's the >same as our flat-four Vanagon, right?) in the *highest* safety category. > >< http://www.folksam.se/forskning/trafik/sakra_bilar/bilListaengelsk.htm > > >Right up there with the Chrysler Voyager! :-# > >While it's only a mark on a chart, I am quite encouraged. FWIW. Dave -- Dave Carpenter Whatever you wish for me, May you have twice as much. "Sometimes I think we're alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we're not. In either case the idea is quite staggering." -- Arthur C. Clarke
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »