

| Subject: | Re: IS THE LIST GETTING SMALLER? |
| From: | Chuck Mathis |
| Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 15:39:37 EDT |
Thank you, David. Well said. I truely miss a lot of the 'old guys' and their wealth of information and experience. There do seem to be more posts by a very vocal goup. Most of these posts are worthless to anyone not in the group. David, you are a valuable asset and I hope you stick around in case I need some obscure piece of electronic trivia to get my temp guage functioning. Chuck '85 Wolfsburg Westy - 'Roland the Road Buffalo' In a message dated 5/28/02 1:44:22 PM, LISTSERV@GERRY.VANAGON.COM writes: >Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:19:40 -0400 >From: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> >Subject: Re: IS THE LIST GETTING SMALLER? > >At 01:07 PM 5/28/2002, developtrust wrote: >>What a bogus posting. I say good riddance to anyone who would try to squelch >>any kind of participation. Tom does a great job in my opinion. >> >>What an immature thing to attempt to blame the list member's content for >a >>reason for leaving. Another attempt at censorship. >> >>Tell the people you met who gave that bogus, childish and petty reason >for >>leaving to stay away if they are stupid enough to deny themselves the >rich >>content of this list. > >William, what you seem to be missing is that the people who leave are the >ones with expertise and experience, who have given many hours of effort >to >assist others. It is hardly censorship to remove oneself from an >environment that has become unpleasant, and many people find blatant >rudeness, hair-trigger squabbling, and endless pushing of >politicosexualsociological philosophies quite unpleasant. I count myself >among them. There is another group who may leave -- that is new members >who have entered in the midst of a bout of incivility and have not had >a >chance yet to discover the value of the list. I seem to remember a certain >feller from California who a) left in a huff after being subscribed for >roughly one day, and b) has proceeded since then to irritate a considerable >fraction of the list membership in various ways including pushing various >personal and political agendas unrelated to Vanagons. He has in general >been treated with considerable forbearance, and I must say that IMHO he's >gotten a lot easier to live with in the last couple months as he absorbs >some of the spirit of the list -- but he'd have done much better to be >a >lot quieter in the beginning. Please forgive my not mincing words in this >situation. > > >>Furthermore, to attempt to lay a guilt trip is outright latent (and blatant) >>manipulation. How childish. Really!! > >I beg to differ. People have, I suppose, every right to be rude, although >it certainly says a lot about them personally -- OTOH other people have >an >equal right to expect an atmosphere of civility and to vote with their >feet when it is missing. If the people who leave are ?coincidentally? >those who have the greatest experience and expertise, then I submit that >the list is the poorer for it. > >On that basis I suggest that it pays to keep the old-timers happy, and >that >in the absence of self-control amongst list members it might indeed be >worthwhile to have a little more active participation by some form of >moderator (not necessarily the list-owner) who has/have the power to say >"This thread is ended, take it private" and make it stick. > >>I hope the list IS getting smaller. I also hope those that want to leave >>just do it and don't waste list band width telling us you are going to >or >>why you did it. > >Does this include everyone? If Tom Carrington decides to leave the list >would you want to know why? And would you be prepared to take over the >ownership of the list, house the machinery, provide the Internet connection >for it and so on as he does? You already know if you've read his postings >that he's disappointed in the lack of self-control evidenced by various >recent flareups. If Dennis Haynes or Harold Nancy or Mark Drillock or >Bob >Donalds or Brent Christensen or Ken Wilford or Ron Salmon or Frank >Condelli or Joel Walker (to name just a few) leave would you like to know >why? I'll even venture an opinion that I myself give more to the list >than >I take from it -- if I get to the end of my tolerance would you care to >know what made this place not worth the effort to me? > >regds, >david > > >-- >David Beierl - Providence, RI > http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ >'84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" >'85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »