

| Subject: | Re: Canadians beware! UPS are a bunch of crooks |
| From: | Ben McCafferty |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jun 2002 09:06:54 -0600 |
I can understand where you're coming from. Your shipment was very low value, and to you, it's a high percentage for clearance. But in the eyes of an international carrier, clearance fees are a fixed cost, so it never occurs to them that your shipper doesn't know about those fees. You should call a few forwarders and ask them what their charge is for clearance these days. You will find that $24 is a pittance. Anyway, I'll leave it alone now. Hopefully everyone out there who is considering international orders in the future will now know to ask about brokerage charges. My wife is a licensed Customs broker in the U.S., if anyone ever wants to know the duty on a particular item they're considering importing. tx, bmc :) "Faith will move mountains, but you'd better bring a shovel...." > From: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM> > Reply-To: Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@USA.DUPONT.COM> > Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:49:34 -0400 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Canadians beware! UPS are a bunch of crooks > > Your problem appears to have been with the "sender" not the "carrier". > > Jay > > > > > 80 Westy Pokey <pokey@VANAGON.ORG>@gerry.vanagon.com> on 06/07/2002 > 10:30:52 AM > > Please respond to 80 Westy Pokey <pokey@VANAGON.ORG> > > Sent by: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> > > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > cc: > Subject: Re: Canadians beware! UPS are a bunch of crooks > > > Fair enough. I guess what I am saying is the blurb on the > waybill does not adequately disclose the magnitude of the > fees, and since the magnitude is as high as it is you > shouldn't have to ask them. > > You are right they are legally entitled to charge fees, I > meant crooks in a metaphorical sense. Like when the dealer > said they were going to charge me $300 to do my alignment, I > left because I did not want to be "robbed".... > > Thanks, > Chris > > ---- Original message ---- >> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 08:24:25 -0600 >> From: Ben McCafferty <ben@kbmc.net> >> Subject: Re: Canadians beware! UPS are a bunch of crooks >> To: 80 Westy Pokey <pokey@VANAGON.ORG>, > <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >> >>> Where do you work UPS? Fedex? >> --Nope, used to work for one of their competitors. >>> >>> I wasn't aware that the seller was using UPS as I stated in >>> my original e-mail there was a miscomunication and he ended >>> up using UPS. This was WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, I did not >>> INTENTIONALLY use them, nor would I EVER. >> --Understood. >>> >>> Moreover, UPS does not go out of their way to inform > senders >>> that the receiver would be subject to brokerage fees > (though >>> I admit it is probably burried in a document). >> --It is stated on every international waybill. When you (or > your shipper) >> signs the bill, you agree to have UPS or FedEx be your > customs broker, and >> to pay their fees according to their tariff. >>> >>> Instead of calling my complaint asinine look at it for what >>> it is... A warning to Canadians that UPS charges hidden > fees >>> that are not readily disclosed to US senders. >> --I'm not calling your complaint asinine. I'm saying that > brokerage fees >> are a normal part of every international shipment, be it TO > Canada, TO the >> US, TO Hong Kong, or wherever. And you're right, they can > add up, >> especially on a low-value shipment like you described. The > forwarder I >> worked for charged $75 for customs clearance--whether your > shipment was >> valued at $10 or $10 million, because the labor and time > involved for >> clearance doesn't change based on the value of the shipment. >> >> Rather than calling your complaint asinine, I'm agreeing > with you that >> people should be aware of the fees involved and ship > accordingly. I do not, >> however, agree that UPS or FedEx are crooks, when their fees > are (BY LAW) >> posted and available in their tariff to anyone who asks. >> >> tx, >> bmc :) >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »