>Hi Ben and all,
>
>I don't know much about all of this stuff, but would be willing to
>participate.  A quick question though, for which I'm sure there's a quick
>answer:
>Why couldn't Vanagon.com be changed and upgraded to include all of these
>sections and ideas?

I think that would be great to use vanagon.com. Mayby someone can shed some
light
on what would be involved with that. I would want to make sure there is
enough editorial
freedom for the various contributors like Ben, myself and others to really
innovate and make
this a great site. I'm sure we could get vanagon.com to point to us at the
very least.

Mayby in the short term we should get it going and when we have established
some results
then it could be incorporated with vanagon.com

Any input on this?

Ed
Reno, NV
87 GL