

| Subject: | Re: Humid Air - Some Comments |
| From: | Clive Smith |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:32:29 +0100 |
Absolutely wonderful And talking of wonderment, I wonder if its the last word? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Grunthaner" <FrankGRUN@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 10:45 PM Subject: Re: Humid Air - Some Comments > What a great day for culture on the list! Avogadro's number and Vanagon in > the same dissertation! There is hope for our society yet. Even the mere > mention of the mole was gave a tingle in the cranium surprisingly similar to > an ounce of Cointreau on ice. > > Nonetheless, Stan, Ed and Arlan are all quite correct ... humid air is less > dense than dry. Also, the extraction or heat transfer ability of the flowing > gas is related primarily to temperature and secondarily to velocity , then to > turbulence and finally to macroscopic porosity or surface area per unit areal > dimension. > > However, this is not the case when the water has not been fully atomized. > Small water droplets (can range from nanoclusters to sub-mm aerosols) offer > the ability to volatilize (get to use the heat of vaporization). This can > significantly enhance net thermal transport and reduce chamber detonation. > Taken to the extreme, a thin layer of water (2 to 4 monolayers) on the > radiator surface at the turbulent air boundary will give superb heat transfer > . Of course, one needs to keep the water film thickness below the level where > the bulk thermal conductivity of the water would dominate. Such thickness > control is generally beyond the ability of most practitioners of the > automotive arts! > > BTW a thin film of Cointreau would work wonderfully as well; what a fine > aroma, but what a waste. > > Have a chemically interesting day! > > Frank Grunthaner
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »