

| Subject: | Re: AT speeds/rpm's |
| From: | Cary Chiang |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:46:13 -0700 |
"As oppose to inline conversion (like ticco or Subaru) that are missing torque." Ben: I don't agree with your comment (or inference) regarding the Subaru flat 4 having less torque at low RPM than the VW 2.1 Waterboxer (though the VW I-4 1.8-2.0 definitely is lower in torque at low RPM). Perhaps you should check this out: http://www.pbase.com/warren8/subaru_vanagon_conversion The last graph shows that the Subaru engines have more torque at a wider (lower, middle, and higher) RPM range compared to the VW waterboxer. Cary --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? New! SBC Yahoo! Dial - 1st Month Free & unlimited access
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »