

| Subject: | Re: Alternative mufflers in place of OEM etc.. |
| From: | Blake C. Thornton |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:42:28 -0600 |
I'm a bit confused. Why go through all this trouble when busdepot has mufflers for $80 or so. blake On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Michael Blackburn wrote: > I decided the price of the VW muffler was a little much for me to stomach > last summer... > > I ended up at a pretty good muffler shop that suggested an alternative to > the stock arrangement. (I had a 1987 2.1 Westy) I ended up needing the > header pipes and ordered them from Bus Depot. But, the only other part > needed was a muffler. The shop used a standard '5" Dodge Can' and welded > the exhaust flange from the old muffler onto it. The Dodge can is a little > shorter than the stock VW can, so an extra long tailpipe was welded on to > make the tailpipe look stock. > > The muffler just clamped into one of the muffler clamps since it was a > little short. But, overall it worked quite well, sounded, and ran just the > same. Well, a little better since the exhaust leak was gone. I think the > total cost of the muffler, welding, and installation was about $100. > > > > Michael Blackburn > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > Of Marshall > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 1:13 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Alternative mufflers in place of OEM etc.. > > > Hi Volks: > > I wonder if any of you have experience using a generic muffler in place of > the stock. > > I'd think that the inlet and outlet sizes need to be the same as stock, and > the body of the muffler should be about the same shape/dimension as the > stock. > > Suppose the above parameters were met in a generic muffler - could it be > used? > > TIA, > > Marshall Ruskin > 84 Westy 1.9 litre > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/21/2002 >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »