

| Subject: | Re: 85 octane in Colorado |
| From: | Clive Smith |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:49:47 +0100 |
Sound a bit weird to me. In fact sounds like a spoof. Ever heard of aircraft using LOWER octanne fuel, quite the opposite? For a given normally aspirated engine, the peak compression pressures will be a bit low, granted, but this is not the only reason for detonation, it being (like most things engineering) a very complicated business, indeed - read anything Ricardo related - a giant among motor engineers. And what if you drive into Colorado in a turbo or supercharged car? If a manufacturer states 95, 93, 91 minimum octane rating, that's generally what they mean. My DJ would have a problem on Super Colorado! Clive Smith '88 Syncro Transporter (DJ 2.1) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard A. Jones" <Jones@COLORADO.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:52 PM Subject: Re: 85 octane in Colorado > > I do have one peeve. What's with the garbage gas in Colorado? "Regular" is 85 octane. Plus > > is what I consider normal for regular at 87 octace. Super is 91, mostly (if available). Get > > me back to a civililzed state and decent gas! > > > Kim: > > I'm enjoying the story of your trip, but our gas in Colorado isn't > garbage. The > octane is reduced because of the altitude, since the oxygen is reduced. > I won't > comment on our level of civilization. ;-) > > Richard A. Jones > Boulder, Colorado > '81 Vanagon Mr Bus > '87 Syncro Westy El Jefe
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »