

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Handling |
| From: | Clive Smith |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Aug 2002 00:16:04 +0100 |
Absolutely! Whilst absolute cornering forces, general handling and braking perfomance can just as good for a large vehicle as a small one, where rate of change of direction, yumping etc are concerned, mass tends to predominate - an irrefutable law of physics. [I just know someones going to argue this... so lets hear it] Clive '88 Syncro Transporter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Stevens" <mtbiker62@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 4:40 PM Subject: Re: Vanagon Handling > There is a fwy exit here in Salt Lake that can be "taken" at 50+ or so and I > often do that while passing cars in the other 2 lanes. My Westy rolls some > but is VERY stable in this kind of situation. Haven't had to avoid a moose > yet, but can appreciate that the laws of physics for quick/defensive > maneuvres may shine differently on my tall box. > Bob > '91 Westy > > http://groups.msn.com/BobsPhotoShare > > > > > > <<... most US owners have Westies, which fail the Moose Test dismally > >due to their high C-of-G and laterally-unbalanced distribution. A > >full-dress camper is just an accident waiting to happen...>> > >> > >> Bull puckey! If there had ever been a problem with campers rolling > >>over left and right, the media would have been all over the story years > >>ago. My bus handles just fine on twisty roads, and if it wasn't a Westy, > > > I'd have sent it to the dump long ago. > > Tell that to the LiMBO owner who rolled his avoiding a moose... > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »