

| Subject: | Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine |
| From: | Robert Donalds |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 07:59:48 -0400 |
Robert I think we are talking about the same cam unless you have changed cames its the web regound cam correct Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wolfvan88@aol.com> To: <Vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>; <bostneng@FCL-US.NET> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:50 AM Subject: Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine > <<<The main problem with going to a non stock cam iswhen you have allot more > duration this disrupts the vacuum signal and youcan't have that with fuel > injection systems and still have driveabilty.>>> > > It is not true...for me at least... > > My modified engine with a bigger duration cam, ratio rockers, lightened > flywheel, mildly ported heads and the Aussie Chip can go from @1500 rpm and > back to 5000+ rpm in fourth gear (@25 mph to @75 mph, I have one more gear > to go also...) smooth with no vibrations... > > > Robert >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »