Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine
From:Robert Donalds
Date:Tue, 27 Aug 2002 07:59:48 -0400

Robert
 I think we are talking about the same cam unless you have changed cames its
the web regound cam correct
Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: <Wolfvan88@aol.com>
To: <Vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>; <bostneng@FCL-US.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: 2.2L EuroCars Engine vs 2.1l Boston Engine

> <<<The main problem with going to a non stock cam iswhen you have allot
more
> duration this disrupts the vacuum signal and youcan't have that with fuel
> injection systems and still have driveabilty.>>>
>
> It is not true...for me at least...
>
> My modified engine with a bigger duration cam, ratio rockers, lightened
> flywheel, mildly ported heads and the Aussie Chip can go  from @1500 rpm
and
> back to 5000+ rpm in fourth gear (@25 mph to @75 mph,  I have one more
gear
> to go also...)  smooth with no vibrations...
>
>
> Robert
>