

| Subject: | Re: Where to aim the headlights? SA grill. |
| From: | Clive Smith |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:22:54 +0100 |
OK, correction gratefully acknowledged .....The other important criteria are the off-side cut-offs (of both lights) on dip and I now know what jackighting is, nothing to do with blinding the driver in front. Clive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Grebneff" <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:16 AM Subject: Re: Where to aim the headlights? SA grill. > >The other important > >criteria is the off-side cut-off on dip, to avoid blinding oncoming traffic. > > Singular. That's CRITERION. > > >And what the hell is jacklighting? > > It's a light mounted under the car, so you can see where to fit the > jack when you have a flat in the wee hours. > > >Ok, I've guessed, but I never cease to be > >amazed at the US terms invented to describe just about everything about the > >world - including tailgating at night. Is that possible anymore anyway, with > >these modern and absurdly over-bright rear lights now being fitted to new > >cars, especilaly those bl*** ridiculous circus lights fitted high-up above > >tail gates - mad, crazy, how is one supposed to pick the subtelties of the > >road ahead by looking through the car in front, or even around it when > >you're being blinded at night by lights that are supposed to be for there > >for safety. Huh! Modern auto engineers seem to be a bunch of immature > >crack-heads out to impress without any real training, study and > >comprehension of ergonomics - and thats what a sensible approach to rear > >light design is - simple ergonomics. I think they should be banned, but what > >has this got to do with headlights - think blue! > > Blame the "safety" lobbing morons and the criminals running the gummint.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »