

| Subject: | Re: On the Appropriateness of the Archive Word |
| From: | David Brodbeck |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:13:05 -0400 |
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, DaveC wrote:
> And *please* use the *identical* subject line (that's what Copy and
> Paste are for). You'd have to be a non-digest subscriber (who uses
> this to follow a thread) to appreciate how helpful this can be.
I'd like to, but the Vanagon mailing list does really unfortunate things
to subject lines. If the line is longer than 70 characters or so, it
inserts lots of spaces to make things pretty. My ISP considers subject
lines with lots of spaces a hallmark of SPAM, and won't let me reply to
those messages until I trim them out.
_ _
__ _ _ _| | | | David M. Brodbeck (N8SRE) Ypsilanti, MI
/ _` | | | | | | +-----------------------------------------------------
| (_| | |_| | | | @ cyberspace.org
\__, |\__,_|_|_| "There is something ironic when the developers name
|___/ housing development after what they bulldozed to build
it, but I think you have to allow some latitude in
naming, so that not every street is called "Suburban
Drive." -- Jan WolterHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »