

| Subject: | Re: More Info on Copper Core German Radiators |
| From: | pensioner |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:32:10 -0700 |
I am an engineer, but I don't play one on TV. Let's look at what a radiator does, rather than of what it is made. The "radiator" is a heat exchanger. It's efficiency in exchanging heat from hot coolant to ambient (100F in Mesa AZ, 60F in Yellowknife) depends on many factors. Rate of heat exchange in BTU per unit time per degree of difference (Coolant - Ambient) for a particular motor and cooling system is what we are trying to ascertain. This is a measurable quantity. In the limits a single tube with one fin does a poor job of exchanging heat. A 1000 tube system with 10000 fins also does a poor job but for a different reason. A critical measurement is the difference between inlet temperature and outlet temperature at a given ambient vs coolant temperature difference. Let's assume the difference between ambient and hot coolant is 125F. A measure of efficiency would then be the difference between inlet and outlet temperatures, as in the final hand the intent is to maximize this difference. If radiator A exhibits a 50F difference and radiator B exhibits a 60F difference, it can be maintained that B is 20% more efficient in the particular application than radiator A. Only measurement will yield definitive results. A numerical design analysis will also yield the difference in the static properties of the radiator, but it will not yield a dynamic result. There are many variables to consider. Among them flow rates, residence time, and coolant specific heat. By simply measuring the radiator in the desired application the actual temperature drop can be ascertained. Of course it is wise to have a reasonable airflow over the two radiators when the measurement is recorded. Aluminum, Copper, two tube, three tube, cross flow, vertical flow. All have effects on the static heat exchange coefficient. Only a reasonably controlled dynamic test reveals the data. Attributed to R. Feynmann: "no matter how elegant the hypothesis, or how eloquent it's presentation, if it doesn't agree with the data, it's wrong" Do the measurement and the result will be obvious to to the casual observer. p
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »