

| Subject: | Re: Video Display Question |
| From: | Dana Showers |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:13:24 -0400 |
I am a computer geek that is pretty good with predicting trends. Don't give up on USB yet. I have noticed a ton of new USB 2.0 (480Mb/sec) devices that are at least as fast as Firewire (400Mb/sec). In my humble opinion, most notebooks will have USB 2.0+ in the future instead of Firewire. I base this opinion of two things: the fact that USB is cheaper for manufacturers and Firewire (Apple product) is slightly different than the IEEE standard. The standards difference is minimal but I have read that this sometimes causes some functionality to disappear when the device is installed on a Windows machine. Off the topic... Take this idea in a home direction. PC with TV card, DVD drive; 5.1 surround; video output to a standard computer projector; sound output to a standard surround amp and speakers. I have this set up in my house. I don't have to buy a separate DVD player, Tivo digital recorder, or large screen TV. I also don't have a ton of living room space devoted to it. I can record TV, VHS to my hard drive. I don't have a way to copy DVD to VHS yet, but I may not want to. I have the projector displaying on a pull down screen that covers two windows. When I am not watching TV, I can look out the window. Being that I work from home, this is goodness. This also doesn't leave any walls conspicuously barren. Dana '85 Westy with laptop DVD theater installed dshowers@cpds.net Better would be a 1Gz P4 processor. Also USB will always be somewhat limiting. Just can't get a lot of data thru that pipeline. A better approach might be Firewire.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »