

| Subject: | Re: 1.9 to 2.1 wbx swap questions |
| From: | Karl M |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:05:54 -0400 |
Thanks for your input, Karl. We've reached a decision and are about to install the engine/trans tomorrow, using the 2.1 cooling system and 1.9 fuel system. The 2.1 fuel system wiring from the donor car was not so good, plus I've heard reports that a 2.1 with Digijet runs even stronger than Digifant. We'll see. The cooling system was a no-brainer once we looked at the difficulty involved, which was basically a trim to the length of the steel pipes, fitting the plastic junction to the front side of the firewall, and a short adaptor hose cut from an old 1.9 hose. Karl ----- Original Message ----- > Karl, > > I finally got my 2.1 installed about a month ago, just two days before our > planned trip from Phx to Vancouver - Hell of a test run; doncha think? I > had purchased the engine from Damian Shaw (great guy, BTW) about a year > earlier, but due to sime medical problems wasn't able to work on it for a > while. > > Anyway, I installed the entire 2.1 system - it just seemed to be the right > thing to do. This way I have the most up-to-date system overall. Don't > know if my judgment was right, but it's done! > > Problems were relatively minor. The biggest I recall was the surprise that > I had to replace the big plastic pipes, since they are different lengths > for the new system. The dashpot for the charcoal cannister needs to be > relocated outside the engine compartment (no room for the larger air > cleaner). relocating the CPU inside the van required using a 2" hole saw > and a threaded rivet gun for mounting the cover. I don't recall any other > changes that were unexpected, and will report to you if I recall any. It > was just a lot of work, since I had the tranny out and was replacing all of > the fuel tank lines at the same time. > > Final results: Better and smoother power and more torque (by seat-of-the- > pants measurement). Seems to be quieter than the 1.9 (heavier exhaust > components?). The 2.1 cooling system seems much easier to bleed, and the > position of the thermostat housing has to be an improvement (the 1.9 t' > housing is a bitch to get off if the bolts have corroded, and they usually > have). If I had it to do over again (thank God I don't), I'd do it the > same way. > > Incidentally, I had a .77 4th gear installed during the tranny rebuild, and > am not looking back on that one. My theory on 2.1l stretch bolt problems > is that they are due in large part to long-term over-revving. I am now > cruising quite comfortable at 3800-4000 rpm, while with the stock gearing I > was regularly well over 4K (long flat desert drives). > > Good luck, > > Karl Wolz
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »