

| Subject: | Re: 0-60 times |
| From: | James |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:10:32 -0700 |
> Correction: C&D clocked Syncro at 18.3 sec, not 8.3. Doh! That was a typo, of course. > Their Syncro had professional driver and great care. Yeah, C&D always manages to squeeze really fast times. James 90 Carat > 10/13/02 9:11:43 PM, James <tornadored@HOTPOP.COM> wrote: > >>> Is this a typo? You should be able to get to 69 in well under 30 >>> seconds, even with an automatic. In fact, the autos will out-run the >>> Syncros. >> >> I'm wondering about this also. I was recently discussing off list with >> another listee and he mentioned that in a recent thread (I couldn't find), >> people were reporting 0-60 times of 30+ seconds for 2.1L 2wd vans. This >> seems really high, even if they were autos. >> >> My ultra-non-scientific run yielded about 19-20 sec in my van (90 Carat >> 2.1L, 2wd, 4spd, 3/4 tank, 150lbs onboard, shifting at ~5k). If my launches >> weren't so bloody horrible, I think I could easily get into the 18 sec >> range. C&D clocked a Syncro Westy (!) at 8.3 sec! >> http://www.vanagon.com/syncros/technica/car-and-driver/index.html >> >> So why are some times so far off (WAY off)? >> >> Curious, >> >> James >> 90 Carat >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf >>> Of Deanna Scoggin Torra >>> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:44 PM >>> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >>> Subject: Re: 0-60 times >>> >>> >>> My 1990 Vanagon (automatic trans) gets to 60 in about one minute if the >>> road is level, but usually there is a grade, or wind, and it takes about >>> 3-4 minutes. >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Charle con sus amigos online usando MSN Messenger: >>> http://messenger.msn.com >> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »