

| Subject: | Re: Roadhaus - 2.2L Engine Install , Prelimanary Report |
| From: | Warren Chapman |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:10:39 -0400 |
This thread cracks me up......what a bunch of hot and bothered armchair BS. Charts and figures may be nice to speculate about, but the "proof of the pudding" is in the driving, ....before and after. One comment here made some sense to me..... >As for seat of the pants feel. Most lay folk I have dealt with think >that the car has more HorsePower, when in fact where they are >experieninge the change is in increased Torque...at a given RPM. That >doesn't mean that there is higher max torque, just that there is more >at a point where the folks notice it. If you notice it .....isn't that the whole goal..???? Whether it's torque or hp or donkey turds...seems to me if you notice it.....it counts. Charts and numbers are great to speculate about on this list (what fun!) but don't mean s__ (except for bragging rights on Vanagon.com) unless you can feel something with that good ole' instrument.....the subjective glutimus maximus. Someone pointed out recently ( with some validity perhaps) that my fine instrument (the glute) just might be influenced towards the optimistic side by the recent departure of significant amounts of cash from its owner. Hmmmmmm....something to think about...... However,....I recently drove a so-called 2.2 waterboxer,..... not by the builder being discussed here...it was prepared by Marco at Buslab in Berkeley, CA. My good ole' glute told me it easily felt stronger (is this torque ??) going through the gears ....than the usual waterleaker, ......and I've driven a few waterboxers.....and owned five different versions in the last two years. Since my glute hadn't parted with any cash in order to have this particular fine experience, could it be considered "objective" in this case ???? But then I'm a known, unobjective, non-fan of the waterboxer anyhow. IMHO 1.9, 2.1 or 2.2......its still a waterleaker and its still limited in rpm's to about 4000 (useful) 5000 (terminal). My vote (which ain't worth much, I know but 20 other people voted here) says spend the money on a better engine. Warren Chapman 90 Syncro Westy, (also with a 2.2L engine, only by Subaru)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »