

| Subject: | Re: Drilled Rotors vs. Big Brake Kit |
| From: | Clive Smith |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2002 02:33:31 -0000 |
Self correction! I used 15/14 but of course the actual rolling diameter could be more or less, depending on tyre aspect ratio. ..anyone for 23/22 = 4.5% Sorreeee! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clive Smith" <clive.harman-smith@NTLWORLD.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:12 AM Subject: Re: Drilled Rotors vs. Big Brake Kit > Slight correction.. > >Braking force for this instance is the torque > applied to the axle by the brakes multiplied by the distance from the hub to > the center of the pad.< > > Thats a torque multiplied by a distance > Ft-Lbs-Ft = Ft ^2 Lbs - wrong units for force, should be lbf only! > > Braking force = braking force (presumably you mean at the centroid of the > pads) > Braking torque = braking force multiplied by the distance from the hub to > the center (centroid) of the pad(s) > > But all you have to really do is use similarity and multiply the original > braking force by the ratio of the New wheel diameter by the Original one. > Easy! > Fnew = Fold * Dnew/Dold, so if the new calipers are the same distance from > the hub centre as the old, we have a 15/14 or 7% greater requirement, but as > the wheels themselves contribute to momentum (angular in this case), as > discussed exhaustively a month or so ago, the requirement is even greater > (when increasing wheel size). > > Suffice to say that since I often carry a ton or more of earth/sand/ballast > in my Syncro, which has 15" wheels, regardless of the debate, I know a set > of solid ventilated SA discs and calipers I've ordered are going to make a > difference - if push comes to shove - which I hope it doesn't too often. I > also happen to think that the standard T25 brakes are pretty good and if > yours aren't, then take a good look at them - the usual problem is thinning > discs and non OEM cow-dung pad material - same goes for Italian cars, put > Lancia pads on a Lancia and it stops, even down a steep hill from 100 mph +; > put any others on and I wouldn't be too sure (speaking from a near death > experience). Don't mess with tyres and brakes, use the best - they're you're > interface with the road effectively. Money well spent. I suspect the drilled > discs with metallic pads are an effective economical replacement option, as > for one, they'll be new! > > Clive > '88 Syncro Transporter > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "pensioner" <al_knoll@PACBELL.NET> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:52 PM > Subject: Re: Drilled Rotors vs. Big Brake Kit > > > > The engineering reason for the SA large brakes with the 15" wheels and > > larger tires has to do with the "effective" braking force. Larger > diameter > > tires require a proportionately larger retarding torque on the wheel to > > generate the same stopping force. Putting 215x75-15 tires on a standard > > syncro westy produces a loss of stopping power as the braking force has to > > work through a larger "moment arm" (distance from axle center to road). A > > few definitions help here: Braking force for this instance is the torque > > applied to the axle by the brakes multiplied by the distance from the hub > to > > the center of the pad. Stopping force is the force generated at the road > to > > tire interface that actually declerates the van. > > > > For a given braking system increasing the tire diameter will decrease the > > stopping force. > > > > To compensate, VWSA added more braking force via a larger disk and caliper > > assembly. > > > > Drilling rotors actually has very little effect in terms of increasing > > braking force. It does allow slightly better cooling over the solid > rotors > > and slightly bettter wet performance. The SA vented rotors are far > superior > > in terms of heat dissipation characteristics than the smaller solid > rotors, > > drilled or not. Drilling can postpone brake fade but not really increase > > the braking force by any significant amount. > > > > The pad to disk interface describes a cylindrical swept area on the disk > > itself. This interface generates heat and the function of the pad is to > > continue to provide contact friction as the temperature of the interface > > rises. At some elevated temperature the pad material will break down and > > exhibit a "glazing" or "carbonizing" characteristic that has a poorer > > pressure to friction coefficient. For the same pad pressure the failed > > material produces significantly less friction and therefore less heat. > The > > heat being dissipated by the thermal mass of the disk and its > configuration > > is how the energy of motion of the van goes from kinetic to heat slowing > the > > van. > > > > Are you listening, Dr. Feynmann? How'd we do? > > > > "fizzix, it's always just fizzix" > > > > pensioner (start slow then taper off) > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »