

| Subject: | Re: Wasserboxer reputation (Long) |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Dec 2002 14:18:04 +1300 |
>Whenever I read a disparaging remark about the WBX, quite frequently it's >from Stan Wilder. While I respect his undying affection for the >air-cooled boxer, the 2.1L WBX is far superior to any air-cooled motor. >Unfortunately the last new WBX was sold 12 years ago so in engineering >terms, the WBX powertrain is now at the end of it's service life. In other >words, the original & previous owners have enjoyed all the reliability & >service designed into the WBX and then they cleverly sold them to us, the >Vanagon list members. That's OK since a worn out 2.1L WBX can be a diamond >in the rough............However......... > >The reconditioning of a tired 2.1L WBX powertrain must be 100% complete & >professional or disappointment will surely follow. Replacing of only one >coolant hose when 6 need renewal sets the stage for untimely failure. >Further the old air-cooled "points & plugs VW mechanic(P&P)" is unfit to >diagnose and repair a 2.1L WBX. The WBX technology requires a VW technician >with factory training and Digifant diagnostic skills. > >Incomplete(half-assed)reconditioning and air-cooled "P&P mechanics" >performing "replace this and see what happens" diagnosis have clearly >Demolished the 2.1L WBX's reputation. First by generating high repair costs >due to unnecessary component replacement and secondly by failing to diagnose >critical mechanical shortcomings in time to avoid a major mechanical >failure. When catastrophic failure occurs, the untrained P&P mechanic is not >likely to take an ad out in the newspaper to announce that they clearly >missed a critical diagnosis. More often than not, the incompetent mechanic >simply condemns the WBX and/or the Digifant system as a poorly designed >loser technology and waxes romantically back to the reliability of the >air-cooled days. Oh come on! The WBX is merely a beetle engine modified to take watercooled top-ends. It has ZERO high-tech in its design and has serious design flaws in its headgasket mating surfaces. The propensity for breaking conrods is also a design flaw. ANYone competent at watercooled engine repair would be perfectly suitable for work on these engines. I'm sure most decent aircooled mechanics are good at watercooled work as well. -- Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »